According to a statistics done by German #Aerzteblatt only 51% of all German males are into giving oral sex (#Cunnilingus for straight and #Fellatio for gay/bisexual accumulated) while 56% are into receiving (#blowjob ) it. While for females it is even a little lesser, 48% are into receiving it while 45% are into giving it. As it seems, also lesbians are counted in here, but are a minor compared to straight females.
So far I can tell that there is no "disgusting" or "unhealthy" thing on giving Cunnilingus (in English, licking #pussy ) simply because I have done it a lot on many different women and so far no tongue or throat #cancer has happened to me. And yes, beside that, there is no "fish shop" down there for me.
I like to ask the whole #Fediverse about this matter. Is that true with you? Disclaimer: Do not come up with some religious-nonsense or other hatred/disapproving/other nonsense here. I'm asking for a Yes or a No and if so, please more details (being passive/active).
Finally I found some time to continue developing (at least a bit) on my upcoming FLOSS Java projects (do I have to add the class path exception here?) with entities (JPA), Enterprise Java Beans and JSF applications.
I have to commit a lot as I have not done that for several months. Now I review my changes and found here and there some bad things, like having "complex" methods in entity classes (you should better write an utility class for these methods and declare them static).
Really a lot stuff to do here. I have many small projects as suggested by my trainer. Have small reusable "components" and not one big "core" that all have to include.
I was trained by a person that was talking and showing to me over a virtual class room. It were actually 3 professionals or "trainer" or "coaches", one for #Java basics and advanced course (still #JavaSE ) and one for #JavaEE basic and advance course and the third was last introduced to me for project management and I got best remarks everywhere. Sure I don't know everything at a glance, in Java with 3 editions, this is next to impossible.
The huge rewrite is finally done. The application "tests" runs again without errors. I have rewritten the launch part of an application by rewriting many pre-deprecated sections and loosing about 5-7 include files (which is good for performance). "Detection" of the application's name (parameter: app) was very badly written, e.g. $_GET was checked again, even when there was already a Requestable instance around.
This is now finally done and I'm going to rewrite my application "hub" towards these changes. The #GIT repository is here:
* Use new bootstrap method of starting application done * Import classes/interfaces/exceptions on-going * Expand all foo_bar_class configuration entries with namespaces pending * Fix all remaining stuff pending
Had been out to my wife's friend's family this day. Yesterday and this morning I continued to rewrote from direct socket resource (no type-hint possible in #PHP ) to socket container class, including interface (as usual for my programming).
Today I have almost finished rewriting my #object-oriented #PHP #framework (not to be confused with yet-another PHP web framework, no) towards #namespace. It took me 77 commits (as I commit not in big chunks anymore) to add namespaces and "import" classes/interfaces + expanding configuration entries with proper namespaces.
My next work will be rewrites in reducing include files in folder "inc", they come from old times where I was "encapsulating" stuff in include files, now I do it with classes and methods.
Still ongoing (or temporary postponed is the rewrite towards a "wrapper" (not following naming convention here!) class around sockets and the bootstrap.
And pushed, tomorrow morning, around for an hour there will be no electricity here, they work on the cables outside and our house number is affected. So I shutdown my computer now (which will ruin the uptime again).
Looks like #gitweb is showing the committer's timestamp and not the author's. Well, that is why all changes has apparently been done on 2017-02-28 (which is not really true). Or maybe a rebase caused this?