f.haeder.net

Roland Häder pinned item Friendica

Cunnilingus and Fellatio, a dying "specicies"?

According to a statistics done by German # only 51% of all German males are into giving oral sex (# for straight and # for gay/bisexual accumulated) while 56% are into receiving (# ) it. While for females it is even a little lesser, 48% are into receiving it while 45% are into giving it. As it seems, also lesbians are counted in here, but are a minor compared to straight females.

The actual graphs and tables can be found here: So far I can tell that there is no "disgusting" or "unhealthy" thing on giving Cunnilingus (in English, licking # ) simply because I have done it a lot on many different women and so far no tongue or throat # has happened to me. :-p And yes, beside that, there is no "fish shop" down there for me. :-)

I like to ask the whole # about this matter. Is that true with you? Disclaimer: Do not come up with some religious-nonsense or other hatred/disapproving/other nonsense here. I'm asking for a Yes or a No and if so, please more details (being passive/active).

Coding convention rewrites 2-5-2 of 2-14-2

PR request 3469 is out which contains changes towards a Friendica-wide coding-convention. As requested earlier, I have splitted my 119 (!) files large PR into several small to make it easier for the reviewers (not to review tons of changes but small chunks then).

So as you (dear users) can see, #Friendica is being rewritten in many directions. No new stuff but more clear code where I hope to have later an even more clear code (better understandable by humans, a computer can read any badly formatted code as long as it is valid).

@Friendica Developers

Edit: Here is the link to the PR: https://github.com/friendica/friendica/pull/3469
PR 3473 is up: https://github.com/friendica/friendica/pull/3473 split 6 of 14 of 2nd wave.
Added some changes to include/text.php, in the start of the PR I just rebased the branch towards upstream/develop.
3588 is out and waits for a CR (with fixes).
I ran php util/typo.php again and it failed ????
:D I hope we can also solve that issue with ./vendor/ directory then. Because looked globally (PHP community) most projects using composer install will ignore it because it is considered as "build" (locally recreated) directory.
What is the issue with vendor?
It should be ignored entirely and not committed as it will be rebuild by composer install. If that is to hard/impossible for some users, then they should download pre-built "binary" packages (including vendor).
This is the end goal, however it is a gradual process. For now I believe we don't have a good enough routine to offer a pre-built archive of the latest version of Friendica, also not all the people using the dev branch are aware about the extra steps required to build the dependencies. I'm voluntarily not in the loop anymore so I couldn't give you a timetable, but I believe it is on track to remove vendor from version control eventually.
Sorry, had not continued on it. Maybe when time allows it. And then I have to rebase a lot.

More coding convention stuff is coming

@Friendica Developers I have more stuff in the pipline regarding coding-convention: https://github.com/friendica/friendica/pull/3103#issuecomment-275389122 Hope you don't mind to review some much ...

Many thanks to @Michael Vogel und @Hypolite on Friendica and one other I don't know here on #Friendica for their continued patience of reviewing such changes.

Most of these changes includes added spaces, converted intending (space -> tab), added curly spaces and usage of dbm::is_result() which is a wrapper for checking if a valid result has been returned from q().
Later posts Earlier posts